Main Article Content

Abstract

Constructivism learning model is an independent learning model for students. The independence of students in learning refers to the activeness of students to seek various information and learning resources, so that students do not only depend on the teaching materials delivered by the teacher. Due to the existence of a very adequate internet network in this 4.0 era, which presents various features and services for users. So, this is very helpful for students in finding information and various learning literacy. So that students do not have difficulty learning specifically in the PAK learning process. However, to avoid mistakes and apply students in interpreting and analyzing the information obtained, the role of the PAK teacher is very necessary to monitor, align and guide students in processing each of the information. considering the information or data obtained from different sources. The purpose of this study is to describe the role model of constructivism learning to increase students' interest and enthusiasm for learning in the online PAK learning model.

Keywords

Constructivism Christian education Online media

Article Details

How to Cite
Telaumbanua, I. S., & Siahaan, M. . (2022). PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONSTRUKTIVISME BAGI PEMBELAJARAN PAK ANAK USIA 8 SAMPAI 10 TAHUN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA ONLINE. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 15(2), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v15i2.108

References

  1. Arnesti, N., & Hamid, A. (2015). Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Online – Offline Dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/jtikp.v2i1.3284
  2. Balas, A. V. | 22 D. 2011 pukul 11:07 pm |. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme. 3(1), 1–13. https://dirinyachapunk.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/model-pembelajaran-konstruktivisme/
  3. Budyastuti, Y., & Fauziati, E. (2021). Penerapan Teori Konstruktivisme pada Pembelajaran Daring Interaktif. Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 112–119.
  4. Cara Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Di Rumah. (2021). Akupintar Blogspot. https://akupintar.id/info-pintar/-/blogs/cara-mengatasi-kesulitan-belajar-siswa-di-rumah, diakses 29 November 2021
  5. Chandra, S. dan A. (2021). The Torah as Theological Foundation of Christian Education. 21–33. https://grafta.stbi.ac.id/index.php/GRAFTA/article/view/11/3
  6. goleman, daniel; boyatzis, Richard; Mckee, A., & Perdana. (2018). Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dalam Rimba. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  7. Kadarwati, A. (2019). Pembelajaran Terpadu. Cv. Ae Media Grafika.
  8. Manafe, V., & Oktaviany, V. (2019). Berpikir untuk memilih Fokus yang Benar Ditinjau dari Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/f3g4a
  9. Marbun, P. (2021). Disain Pembelajaran Online Pada Era Dan Pasca Covid-19. CSRID (Computer Science Research and Its Development Journal), 12(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.22303/csrid.12.2.2020.129-142
  10. Masgumelar. (2021). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 49–57. GHAITSA : Islamic Education Journal, 2(March), 49–57. https://www.siducat.org/index.php/ghaitsa/article/view/188%0Ahttps://siducat.org/index.php/ghaitsa/article/view/188
  11. Nugroho, A. (2020). Rekonstruksi Teologis terhadap Pendekatan Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Sosial [Theological Reconstruction Toward Social Constructivism Learning Approach]. Diligentia: Journal of Theology and Christian Education.
  12. Nurhidayati, E. (2017). Pedagogi Konstruktivisme dalam Praksis Pendidikan Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201711.2
  13. Pembelajaran Daring Berintegritas Di Era Pandemi. (2021). Blog SMAN 1 Magelang. https://sman1-mgl.sch.id/new/blog/2021/01/01/simak-jurus-jitu-wujudkan-pembelajaran-daring-berintegritas-di-era-pandemi-2/, di akses 25 November 2021
  14. Pohan, J. . (2019). Filsafat Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  15. Rahmawati, M., & Suryadi, E. (2019). Guru sebagai fasilitator dan efektivitas belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 4(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v4i1.14954
  16. Sundawan, M. D. (2016). Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Dan Model Pembelajaran Langsung. Jurnal Logika, XVI(1), 1–11.
  17. Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. Islamika, 1(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v1i2.208
  18. Tarigan, T. P. E. (2019). Menyikapi Era Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Pak. Jurnal Penelitian Fisikawan, 2(2), 22–28. http://jurnal.darmaagung.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpenelitianfisikawan/article/view/318
  19. Widodo, A. (2005). Tahapan Pembelajaran yang Konstruktivis : Bagaimanakah Pembelajaran Sains di Sekolah ? Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, September, 1–11.
  20. Yasmin, M. (2008). Paradigma Pendidikan Konstruktivisme. GP Press.
  21. Zalyana, Z. (2016). Perbandingan Konsep Belajar, Strategi Pembelajaran dan Peran Guru (Perspektif Behaviorisme dan Konstruktivisme). Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 13(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-hikmah:jaip.2016.vol13(1).1512